Leaning Toward Change

Seduced by the publicity surrounding the impact of Lean on organizations, it's no surprise that people new to Lean, upon hearing or reading such information, are anxious to implement a continuous improvement initiative in their organizations.

What has received little publicity, however, and often frustrates Lean implementation, are the employees on whom Lean is often inflicted, albeit unwittingly. The culture of an organization can repel attempts to implement Lean, so it is vital to understand the culture that you have, so that you can create a cost-effective implementation plan. I say cost-effective, because many organizations spend more time, effort and money to implement Lean than they first envisage, or they give up, or they settle for a halfway house solution. Often, they do not realise that it is their prevailing culture that is out of alignment with the ideology of Lean.

Here is a story of one company, between 2002 and 2004, who realised that they needed to be cognisant of their organizational culture when implementing their Lean programme. The company concerned is a fully integrated manufacturing business, covering product development and design, through to product installation. Sales are around $25 million. They employ 150 people. The company had changed ownership at the beginning of 2002, moving from being part of a much larger business to a stand-alone profit centre. I'll call them ABC Co, for purposes of anonymity.

In the summer of 2002, a survey was undertaken, to assess the prevailing organizational culture, to understand how well the existing climate would support Lean working methods. The results were revealing. They showed that, on nine out of the ten 'dimensions' of organizational culture, employees perceived the organization as being below average. In particular, the employees felt that communications, structure, planning, leadership & humanistic working practises were inappropriate. Interestingly, the one above average response said that employees viewed the organization as being a sociable place to work, although morale was slightly below average.

Put into context, employees appeared to be saying that the organization was very hierarchical, rigid and autocratic and not a people centred company. The sociability seemed to arise out of two situations: firstly, the organization had been established for very many years, with little staff turnover, and secondly, employees 'stuck' together, to defend themselves against the management. Morale appeared to have dropped over the preceding months, largely because the employees were apprehensive about what the new management team were going to get up to. This did not appear to be a particularly good cultural backdrop for a smooth Lean implementation programme.

Meetings were held with the Directors, to discuss the results of the organizational culture survey, and to create an action plan to try and improve the working climate, before announcing a Lean implementation initiative a few months later. Incidentally, during the survey, employees had commented negatively on how previous management initiatives had 'fizzled-out' after a very short while.

Anecdotal evidence during the period following the original survey suggested that the management were trying to address the employee concerns. A Lean initiative was announced, and commenced in Autumn 2002.

In January 2004, the organizational culture survey was repeated.

Compared to those four 'dimensions' in the 2002 survey, which attracted particularly negative views from employees, the 2004 survey results showed that employees perceptions had improved marginally on communications practises and considerably on leadership practises and organizational structure. Employee perceptions had lowered on how sociable the company was and how committed employees were towards the company. This was echoed in the morale 'score', with a drop of 26%, and on the secure/insecure scale, a drop of 31%.

Comparing the 2002, and 2004 surveys, some of the key findings were:

- Whilst employees perceived that the organization had repositioned itself to become more customer focused, and more competitive, they did not feel as happy, or as secure as they previously had.

- Employees initially enjoyed the communication sessions, where they heard about the Lean implementation initiative, which sounded like a good idea.

- The Lean implementation programme had started well, and employees felt informed and involved.

- The communications sessions became less frequent, and patchy.

- Employees became less involved with continuous improvements, supervisors and managers started to tell employees about what Lean changes were going to be made.

- Employee turnover for the past three years was rising, with an overall turnover of nearly 70% during the period.

Conclusions

The new management appeared to have had every intention to engender an organizational culture that was more conducive to Lean working, and originally started out in earnest to change the working 'climate'. Unfortunately, many of those management actions that were agreed, to improve the working climate, and initially implemented, started to falter. This was mainly due to commercial pressures imposed on management time and, in response, the management tried to speed up Lean implementation, in an attempt to reconcile their time pressures whilst still producing the desired business results. As a consequence, a number of continuous improvements were originated and implemented by supervisors and managers, not by employee teams. As a result, employees felt less involved than they were, less motivated, and started to think that there was a 'hidden agenda'.

Here is a good and factual example of how Lean implementation can fail to achieve the desired results, because not enough attention is paid to nurturing the culture of the organization. In ABC Co, the decision to implement Lean was decided locally, so there wasn't a head office imposing it on unwilling Directors. Why is it that a group of Directors, seemingly committed to Lean principles can fail to realise its potential? There has to be a good personal understanding of the people side of Lean, implementation has to be at a pace that takes employees with you on the journey, not leaving them someway behind, scratching their heads, wondering what it is all about. It's all too easy, especially for experienced Lean practitioners who move to a new company, to go too fast for the employees; they need to have time to understand, practise and adapt to the Lean ways of working. I'm not suggesting that Lean implementation has to be a slow, arduous process, far from it, but if you want a timely and successful introduction, you must major heavily on the people-side of the process. Take communications, it is amazing just how insatiable employees are for information. Many organizations fall into the trap of reducing communications, because employees don't seem to be bothered - some stand there looking bored. Don't be misled! As you reduce communications, I bet that there is a positive correlation with lowered morale, attendance and participation, although I haven't tested for this ? yet.

Mark Eaton holds the Viscount Nuffield Medal for his contribution to UK Industry and was until recently the Director of the UK Government's Manufacturing Advisory Service for London and South East England. Mark wrote this article in collaboration with Tim Franklin who is completing his doctoral research in organisational development.

markeaton@advanceprojects.co.uk

---

Steps to Build ISO 9001 Compliant Program

Implementing an ISO 9001 system represents a major effort. However,... Read More

Can A Business Still Be Profitable When People Skills Are Absent?

In our current world of rapid and amazing technological advances,... Read More

Stop Waste, Fraud and Abuse

Each year, businesses write-off six percent of revenue to waste,... Read More

Phone Sex is Bad for Business

On August 3rd/2005, Reuters reported that a German man had... Read More

A Corporate Facelift With Sound Bytes

If Baby Boomers can get botox and tummy tucks, then... Read More

Character: Is It Necessary In Leadership? (Part Two)

In the first part of this two part article, I... Read More

Why Businesses Need to Start Nurturing Collective Wisdom

COLLECTIVE WISDOM CAN BE AN effective tool for solving the... Read More

Manage or Lead ? Why the Difference Matters and What to Do About That Difference

Many books have been written about managing people, and an... Read More

Avoid These Seven Deadly Dangers Of Outsourcing

Here are seven dangers of outsourcing your software development. They... Read More

2 Steps For Increasing Company Profits or Performing Business Turnarounds

1. Eliminate wasteEliminate reports, habits, products, duplicate input, and processes... Read More

Catch Your Staff Doing Something Right

A long time ago, I learned something about being a... Read More

Action Learning: Its More Than OJT

For centuries companies have used on-the-job training (OJT). OJT works... Read More

What To Do When Your IT Project Is Late, Over Budget, and Looks Like It?s Never Going To Work

Here's a scary statistic. According to four prominent research firms,... Read More

Improving Your Inter-Company Communications At No Cost

It's all very well having a flashy (and expensive) advertising... Read More

Rules for Running a Meeting

As an experienced manager, I can announce without a doubt... Read More

Managing Dickheads

"We are so different and individualistic that we can't work... Read More

The Inferno of the Finance Director

Sometimes, I harbour a suspicion that Dante was a Financial... Read More

ISO 9001 2000, Getting Started on The Route To Registration

ISO 9001 2000, Getting startedBefore starting the ISO 9001 2000... Read More

Learn About Commercial Collections Agencies Fees

As with any other service, there are good and bad... Read More

Punctuality in Business: What it Says About You

"Nothing inspires confidence in a business man sooner than punctuality,... Read More

Give Yourself a Boss Day Gift, Part 2: Are You the Position or the Person?

Are you the position or the person?Bosses can lose their... Read More

I Said Pareto Chart? Not Potato Chart!

Does this sound familiar? You were hired for the new... Read More

Delegation Obstructions

OBSTRUCTIONS: 1. Staff deficiencies. Lack of confidence in employees quite... Read More

Project Management - Preventing Project Slips

Can Project Managers prevent projects from slipping?Ask a techie to... Read More

Outsourcing Problem Analysis

As an HR professional, you have responsibilities in several broad... Read More

Profits and Business Success - 5 Profit Traps to Watch Out For

The old saying 'You have to spend money to make... Read More

Factoring Financing: How to Grow Your Business Without Debt or Loans

What is factoring?Accounts receivable financing, also known as factoring, is... Read More

5 Management Decision Making Lessons from a Long Shot. A Heartening Belmont Victory

Like many, I watched the 134th Belmont Stakes hoping to... Read More

Dialogue vs. Discussion

Have you ever sat in a meeting where everyone is... Read More

Five Ways to Increase Profitability By Doing The Right Thing

1. Base your business in the Magic Triangle. Honesty, integrity,... Read More

Faith is the LIFE-blood of Your ACTIONS before the Benefit -

Nothing has changed. Your ancestors lived by faith. Some planted... Read More

To Outsource or Not to Outsource

In these days of restricted head count and tight budgets,... Read More

MANAGING CRISIS; when you?re too good at it

When you are acclaimed for excellence during times of crisis... Read More