INTRODUCTION
Moral values, rules, principles, and judgements are often thought of as beliefs or as true beliefs. Those who hold them to be true beliefs also annex to them a warrant or a justification (from the "real world"). Yet, it is far more reasonable to conceive of morality (ethics) as a state of mind, a mental state. It entails belief, but not necessarily true belief, or justification. As a mental state, morality cannot admit the "world" (right and wrong, evidence, goals, or results) into its logical formal definition. The world is never part of the definition of a mental state.
Another way of looking at it, though, is that morality cannot be defined in terms of goals and results - because these goals and results ARE morality itself. Such a definition would be tautological.
There is no guarantee that we know when we are in a certain mental state. Morality is no exception.
An analysis based on the schemata and arguments proposed by Timothy Williamson follows.
Moral Mental State - A Synopsis
Morality is the mental state that comprises a series of attitudes to propositions. There are four classes of moral propositions: "It is wrong to...", "It is right to...", (You should) do this...", "(You should) not do this...". The most common moral state of mind is: one adheres to p. Adhering to p has a non-trivial analysis in the more basic terms of (a component of) believing and (a component of) knowing, to be conceptually and metaphysically analysed later. Its conceptual status is questionable because we need to decompose it to obtain the necessary and sufficient conditions for its possession (Peacocke, 1992). It may be a complex (secondary) concept.
See here for a more detailed analysis.
Adhering to proposition p is not merely believing that p and knowing that p but also that something should be so, if and only if p (moral law).
Morality is not a factive attitude. One believes p to be true - but knows p to be contingently true (dependent on epoch, place, and culture). Since knowing is a factive attitude, the truth it relates to is the contingently true nature of moral propositions.
Morality relates objects to moral propositions and it is a mental state (for every p, having a moral mental relation to p is a mental state).
Adhering to p entails believing p (involves the mental state of belief). In other words, one cannot adhere without believing. Being in a moral mental state is both necessary and sufficient for adhering to p. Since no "truth" is involved - there is no non-mental component of adhering to p.
Adhering to p is a conjunction with each of the conjuncts (believing p and knowing p) a necessary condition - and the conjunction is necessary and sufficient for adhering to p.
One doesn't always know if one adheres to p. Many moral rules are generated "on the fly", as a reaction to circumstances and moral dilemmas. It is possible to adhere to p falsely (and behave differently when faced with the harsh test of reality). A sceptic would say that for any moral proposition p - one is in the position to know that one doesn't believe p. Admittedly, it is possible for a moral agent to adhere to p without being in the position to know that one adheres to p, as we illustrated above. One can also fail to adhere to p without knowing that one fails to adhere to p. As Williamson says "transparency (to be in the position to know one's mental state) is false". Naturally, one knows one's mental state better than one knows other people's. There is an observational asymmetry involved. We have non-observational (privileged) access to our mental state and observational access to other people's mental states. Thus, we can say that we know our morality non-observationally (directly) - while we are only able to observe other people's morality.
One believes moral propositions and knows moral propositions. Whether the belief itself is rational or not, is debatable. But the moral mental state strongly imitates rational belief (which relies on reasoning). In other words, the moral mental state masquerades as a factive attitude, though it is not. The confusion arises from the normative nature of knowing and being rational. Normative elements exist in belief attributions, too, but, for some reason, are considered "outside the realm of belief". Belief, for instance, entails the grasping of mental content, its rational processing and manipulation, defeasible reaction to new information.
We will not go here into the distinction offered by Williamson between "believing truly" (not a mental state, according to him) and "believing". Suffice it to say that adhering to p is a mental state, metaphysically speaking - and that "adheres to p" is a (complex or secondary) mental concept. The structure of adheres to p is such that the non-mental concepts are the content clause of the attitude ascription and, thus do not render the concept thus expressed non-mental: adheres to (right and wrong, evidence, goals, or results).
Williamson's Mental State Operator calculus is applied.
Origin is essential when we strive to fully understand the relations between adhering that p and other moral concepts (right, wrong, justified, etc.). To be in the moral state requires the adoption of specific paths, causes, and behaviour modes. Moral justification and moral judgement are such paths.
Knowing, Believing and their Conjunction
We said above that:
"Adhering to p is a conjunction with each of the conjuncts (believing p and knowing p) a necessary condition - and the conjunction is necessary and sufficient for adhering to p."
Williamson suggests that one believes p if and only if one has an attitude to proposition p indiscriminable from knowing p. Another idea is that to believe p is to treat p as if one knew p. Thus, knowing is central to believing though by no means does it account for the entire spectrum of belief (example: someone who chooses to believe in God even though he doesn't know if God exists). Knowledge does determine what is and is not appropriate to believe, though ("standard of appropriateness"). Evidence helps justify belief.
But knowing as a mental state is possible without having a concept of knowing. One can treat propositions in the same way one treats propositions that one knows - even if one lacks concept of knowing. It is possible (and practical) to rely on a proposition as a premise if one has a factive propositional attitude to it. In other words, to treat the proposition as though it is known and then to believe in it.
As Williamson says, "believing is a kind of a botched knowing". Knowledge is the aim of belief, its goal.
About The Author
Sam Vaknin is the author of "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited" and the editor of mental health categories in The Open Directory, Suite101, and searcheurope.com.
His web site: http://samvak.tripod.com
Frequently asked questions regarding narcissism: http://samvak.tripod.com/faq1.html
Narcissistic Personality Disorder on Suite101: http://www.suite101.com/welcome.cfm/npd
All of us suffer from some form of emotional distress... Read More
To seek and find truth requires that we communicate within... Read More
The Encyclopaedia Britannica (1999 edition) defines empathy as:"The ability to... Read More
The word "cognition" is defined as "the act of knowing"... Read More
It's important to know that Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and... Read More
Well the conspiracy theorists are out in full force I... Read More
I. The Three IntuitionsIA. Eidetic IntuitionsIntuition is supposed to be... Read More
Even though the percentage of people with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity... Read More
Self hypnosis is usually thought of as a person listening... Read More
Trust is the basis of all human relationships. Trust can... Read More
Some think the world is coming to an end, they... Read More
Over the past 10 years I have helped individuals who... Read More
Schizophrenics hallucinate alternate realities. People who claim to have been... Read More
Jill is a 21 y/o college student who used to... Read More
In my fifteen years of private practice working with children... Read More
We are all terminally ill. It is a matter of... Read More
Evidence of hypnotic-like phenomena appears in many ancient cultures. The... Read More
Most narcissists (75%) are men.NPD is one of a "family"... Read More
Solution Focus is the brain child of Insoo Kim Berg... Read More
Repeated research studies have revealed that secular efforts at rehabilitation... Read More
STUDY STRATEGIES* Revise regularly- Revision should be continuous if you... Read More
A pattern of traits and behaviours which signify infatuation and... Read More
("He" in this text - to mean "He" or "She").We... Read More
Through out the course of one's life one is faced... Read More
Swedish Scientists did a study and found that young men... Read More
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder is a medical condition. It is... Read More
IntroductionIn this world today, there are a lot of unbelievable... Read More
Our life in society hovers around the concept of 'You?I?... Read More
Much of the time when a new idea comes to... Read More
In two articles entitled "We Are Not Our Personalities" and... Read More
THE ACTS OF CREATION:The following quote is a review I... Read More
I'm sure you've heard the term "Identity Crisis" before. It's... Read More
Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences developed as he worked... Read More
There are several key Solution Focus interviewing skills that are... Read More
Narcissism constitutes the entire personality. It is all-pervasive. Being a... Read More
There is one place in which one's privacy, intimacy, integrity... Read More
Through out the course of one's life one is faced... Read More
After a long and patient wait in queue, you reached... Read More
It's important to know that Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and... Read More
Countess Erszebet Bathory was a breathtakingly beautiful, unusually well-educated woman,... Read More
Dogs picture in their minds an event of an activity... Read More
When Marcus and Sally first met they immediately felt like... Read More
The endless, immeasurable brain. It does seem like more we... Read More
FIVE DON'T DO'SHow to Avoid the Wrath of the NarcissistNever... Read More
Every police officer will tell you that when there is... Read More
The word "cognition" is defined as "the act of knowing"... Read More
First of all, a bit of background: A high school... Read More
What makes a common person a Serial Killer? According to... Read More
Again, many of us think we listen, yet we don't... Read More
Self hypnosis is usually thought of as a person listening... Read More
On the outset all observations may seem to be objective,... Read More
Most narcissists (75%) are men.NPD is one of a "family"... Read More
"The new narcissist is haunted not by guilt but by... Read More
At around 3.40am on August 31st 1888, a carter named... Read More
Sometimes I think that I have a mental health problem... Read More
THE ACTS OF CREATION:The following quote is a review I... Read More
Sarah is a 28 y/o accountant who had a traumatic... Read More
The limbic systemNerve impulses were known to relay feelings and... Read More
Why is it that one person enjoys math, while another... Read More
Information is flowing to us at a great rate. The... Read More
In my fifteen years of private practice working with children... Read More
A powerful tool for health as we approach the new... Read More
WHAT ARE BRAINWAVES?Every moment of your life your brain is... Read More
Many Science Fiction authors have discussed in many works the... Read More
Evidence of hypnotic-like phenomena appears in many ancient cultures. The... Read More
Well the conspiracy theorists are out in full force I... Read More
Psychology |