An Introduction to the Connecticut State Budget for 2004-2005

The Connecticut Conference of Municipalities (CCM) is interested in the state's budgetary health, so that the conference can estimate how much money the state will transfer to local towns and municipalities. To determine the fiscal health of any state, the first place to examine is expenditures on prescription drugs for the state's Medicaid program. Rising prescription drug costs are the single most important explanatory factor for the increases in health care costs, health insurance premiums across the country, and state budget deficits. Connecticut is no exception.

Prescription Drug Formulary. With little or no public fanfare, Connecticut took an important step in gaining control over escalating drug costs when the state legislature passed a preferred drug formulary. The formulary requires pharmaceutical companies to provide the state with "supplemental rebates" above and beyond those already mandated by federal law for prescription drugs provided under the Medicaid law. The pharmaceutical industry is suing to stop the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from approving these kinds of rebate plans; the pharmaceutical industry contends the states are violating federal law by establishing drug formularies based upon the cost of drugs, not the efficacy of the medications. But the whole point of a preferred drug formulary is to contain costs, so naturally the price of drugs---on and off the formulary---should be relevant.

Connecticut had to take some step to contain its cost of providing state-supported prescription drugs. A presentation at a 2001 meeting of the International Society for Pharmaceutical Economics and Outcomes Research, available on the Internet at http://www.ispor.org/ meetings/va0503/presentations_pdf/poster/PHP17.pdf, showed the national average cost for the top five maintenance drugs prescribed through Medicaid was $1200/person. However, the cost in Connecticut for these same top five Medicaid-supplied drugs was $2,732/person. Clearly, Connecticut needed a range of different financial controls to bring its prescription drug costs in line with the national average. The two main forms of price controls adopted in Connecticut were the drug formulary and the prior authorization plan.

The preferred drug formulary and the prior authorization plan apply to Connecticut's Medicaid, General Assistance, and ConnPace programs. The state legislature exempted a certain class of drugs, i.e., atypical anti-psychotic drugs, from the preferred formulary. In Connecticut, a pharmacist shall not dispense any initial maintenance drug prescription for which there is a generic substitute without obtaining prior authorization from the state's Social Services department. These two price control measures have enabled Connecticut to exercise modest control over state spending on prescription drugs. That is good news for Connecticut taxpayers and the CCM.

Burgeoning Health Care Needs. But Connecticut still faces challenges on the health care front. The National Alliance for Mental Illness reports Connecticut has (1) 6000 people who are homeless and mentally ill, (2) almost 2600 people with serious mental illnesses in nursing homes, (3) over 12% of the CT prison population with serious mental illnesses and over 70% with addictive disorders, and (4) emergency rooms overflowing with children and adults in crisis with no place to go. "Yet, the [Governor's budget] has proposed eliminating all medical help for poor, single adults, slashing medical insurance for working poor families, cutting community health centers, and several more pages of reckless cuts and fees imposed on people who survive at less than 50% of the federal poverty level," according to the Connecticut chapter of the National Alliance. Traditionally, neither the county nor the municipal governments have been required to pay for medical services for the poor and those without insurance. However, county and municipal facilities will feel the impact, directly and indirectly, of state budgetary cuts in health care services.

Governing.com. Outside of health care expenditures, Connecticut is facing the same budget deficit environment as the other forty-nine states. The downturn in the economy has meant less tax revenues were collected from all sources. At this point, Connecticut needs to focus on reshaping its tax and spending habits in a way that induces future economic activity, rather than focus on even more ways to tax the citizens of Connecticut. In this regard, Connecticut has received very poor advice from Governing Magazine and its associated web site, governing.com.

In a special report entitled "Grading State Tax Systems," governing.com offers a prescription of forcing income taxes on states that don't have them and raising these taxes for states that do. The report is not an objective piece of public finance analysis. It is propaganda for a pro-tax, bigger government services, bigger government spending agenda. The report ranks every state without a state income tax as ipso facto unfair and regressive in its tax structure. The absence of debilitating state income taxes in no way establishes the unfairness of a state's revenue tax stream, as evidenced by the fact that polls show both rich and poor, Democrat and Republican, young and old, favor the status quo over the introduction of a state income tax. The ipso facto conclusions of governing.com are nothing more than unsubstantiated ipse dixit.

The governing.com report emphasizes that elected officials should never give the taxpayers an opportunity to vote on tax increases or new forms of taxation. Instead of government of the people, and by the people, and for the people, the governing.com report adopts the position that government should come at the people and try to sock them with as many taxes as necessary to achieve a desirable level of local and state public services. Never, never give the citizens a chance to vote on tax increases, governing.com advises its readers, because citizens will routinely and consistently vote to keep taxes down. The premise of the governing.com report is un-American, un-democratic, and unsupportable.

Connecticut's income tax. Consider the report's unabashed endorsement of Connecticut's state income tax: "What's more, there's a widespread belief on the part of many voters that any change is going to hurt them. A little more than a decade ago, that was precisely the situation in Connecticut, which did not have an income tax but did have high taxes on all sales, corporate profits, utilities and estates. There were recommendations to acquire an income tax, but governors Ella Grasso and William A. O'Neill both took 'the pledge' to make sure that such a thing would never sully the liberty-loving citizens of the Nutmeg State. Residents who would have clearly benefited from the new tax dreaded it, believing those who predicted that once it was installed, it would just be raised and raised again until it didn't pay to get out of bed and go to work in Connecticut."

"As existing taxes skyrocketed, Governor Lowell Weicker pushed for the new tax. He was burned in effigy, but he and a courageous group of legislators worked to bring the new income stream into existence in 1991. And, despite all the dire predictions, the income tax seems to have given Connecticut a balanced tax system for the first time. 'In 1990, we had a sign on the door, don't invest here, don't form a corporation here and don't retire here,' says Connecticut state Senator William Nickerson, the ranking member of the Finance, Revenue, and Bonding Committee. 'Tax reform took away significant disincentives.'"

Today, the budget crises in Florida, Tennessee, and Texas are in fact far less perilous than most of the states that have state income taxes. In fact, governing.com would have egg on its face to learn that Tennessee begins its second year of budget hearings under Democratic Governor Phil Bredesen with a $150 million surplus, not a deficit, from last fiscal year.

Similarly, governing.com goes on to state, "Today, Florida, Tennessee and Texas are all facing serious financial problems. They don't have an income tax. And leaders in these states have taken 'the pledge' to make sure they don't get one." The governing.com piece offers these types of assertions without any proof. Today, the budget crises in Florida, Tennessee, and Texas are in fact far less perilous than most of the states that have state income taxes. In fact, governing.com would have egg on its face to learn that Tennessee begins its second year of budget hearings under Democratic Governor Phil Bredesen with a $150 million surplus, not a deficit, from last fiscal year. True to his frugal management style, Bredesen has pledged that all of the surplus funds will be used to replenish the state's reserve funds, which were largely depleted in budget wrangling in prior years.

The remainder of this article can be found at http://riskmgmt.biz/lawnews/ctbudget.htm

Dr. Michael A. S. Guth, Ph.D., J.D., is a consulting economist, legal brief writer, and law newspaper Editor-in-Chief. He writes a variety of articles on constitutional law, elder care, consumer credit card debt, appellate court term reviews, and law and society. See http://riskmgmt.biz/ for an introduction to his legal work, and http://riskmgmt.biz/lawarticles.htm for a listing of many of his articles. Dr. Guth writes legal articles and briefs for other law firms, and he assists pro se parties (those without a lawyer) in preparing documents they can file in court such as motions pertaining to child custody, visitation interference, and child support defense.

---

A Viewpoint Not Represented in the Mainstream Media

The news media will regularly present views from Democratic (liberal),... Read More

Maximizing Efficiency at Our Airports

Our Airports have excess capacity, which is not being used... Read More

The Project For A New American Century

Let the reader be reminded, that this document we are... Read More

Illegal Aliens and Homeland Security; Rants from Lance 2003

Is it just me or are you concerned that illegal... Read More

For they know not what they do; Federal Regulators destroying business

Federal Regulations on Business Destroy America, these regulations are a... Read More

We Do Not Have An Upside Down Trade Deficit Because We Cannot Compete

Our trade deficit is directly proportional to our attacks on... Read More

Bodyguard Training in Mexico; My Experiences While Providing BG Training in Mexico

Mexico the country of Salsa, Tortillas and Corruption; I first... Read More

Upcoming Palestinian Elections Might Put Extremists In Power

The Palestinian Fatah Movement is doing whatever it can to... Read More

Government is a Franchise System; just not a very good one

Few understand the Franchising Format and even fewer have correlated... Read More

The Irish Issue

The expertise and advancement of the evolution of man and... Read More

Transporting Troops in the Future

Currently when we transport troops we use large cargo planes... Read More

What could Macedonia Learn from a Tiger? Asian Tigers and Uninterrupted Economic Growth

The first reaction of economies in transition is a sharp... Read More

A Journey Through History

History repeats itself, goes the cliche. It does so, perhaps,... Read More

Is it just hubris, or ...?

In what the Americans love to describe as the war... Read More

Gone With the Wind Almost Did Not Make It

Corporate America has been shaken recently by lawsuits and criminal... Read More

Will They Sterilize Vagabonds and Drunkards in Belarus?

In Belarus parliament is going to struggle with degeneration of... Read More

The Politics Of The American Dream

The American Dream is the promise to have it all... Read More

There Ought to Be a Law

The 'Land of the Free' is teaming with individual rights... Read More

Simple Middle East Peace Plan

I. WARS ARE BASIC CONFLICTS OVER LAND. II. BOUNDARIES. THE... Read More

Electronic Commerce Taxation: Emerging Legal Issues - Part I

The CBR taxes the Pakistani source income of nonresident individuals... Read More

Shooting Around Corners with New Concept

Currently the United States has weapons, which can shoot around... Read More

The Glorious Acts of Our Legislature

I always have to remember to take a deep breath... Read More

Corruption and Transparency

I. The FactsJust days before a much-awaited donor conference, the... Read More

Competition Laws

A. THE PHILOSOPHY OF COMPETITIONThe aims of competition (anti-trust) laws... Read More

Michael Moore: The Dumbest People on the Face of the Earth

"Fahrenheit 9/11" auteur Michael Moore recently fueled the epidemic of... Read More

Are Social Security Private Accounts a Good Deal or Raw Deal for African Americans?

How many legs does a dog have if you call... Read More

Between Hiroshima Japan 6 August and the NY 11 September!

Japan lit its candles of pure, "noble sadness" on the... Read More

Federal Trade Commission Partnerships Questioned

In many reports we see that the Federal Trade Commission... Read More

TSA Missteps at Our Airports

The TSA seems to have completely missed the ball at... Read More

Computer Cyber virus attack from hackers

Recently the CIA staged a practice simulation of a cyber... Read More

Sarbanes-Oxley Reality Check on Bureaucracy

There is no doubt in hindsight that Sarbanes Oxley was... Read More

Lets Make Some Things Clear about John Thune/Dan Nelson/MetaBank MetaGate

Let's make one thing clear: This Dan Nelson Automotive fiasco... Read More

Richard Nixon, the truth

Richard Nixon was by far a most fascinating and colorful... Read More