Clint Eastwood recently plunged into the murky political pond with his statement, "Extremism is so easy. You've got your position, and that's it. It doesn't take much thought. And when you go far enough to the right, you meet the same idiots coming around from the left."
Is it easy to be an extremist, and is the political scale truly circular, so that the "far right" clasps hands with the "far left"? Does the left-right continuum serve as a constructive paradigm upon which society can be structured?
Today's "extremists" are in good company: Jesus, Martin Luther, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, and Baruch Spinoza all bore this label at one time. Jan De Witt and his brother Cornelius-17th Century Dutch politicians-were hacked to death by the populace, largely due to their "radical" and "unsavory" political perspective. Their crime? They were proponents of democracy. Their body parts were displayed in storefronts all over town.
Who shall we call extreme? The vigilantes who did the lynching? The shopkeepers who showcased the body parts? Or the De Witts with their pro-democracy stance?
Do "extreme" beliefs emanate from a mechanical thought process, as Eastwood suggests, rather than an intense philosophical journey? It arguably requires reflection and hypercritical analysis to defend ones theories against the cloned, echoed and mass produced opinion of the common folk; it requires conviction to risk social ostracism and other forms of retaliation.
The "approved" or popular view is more likely to be perfunctory. Why think when one can plagiarize? Why go out on a limb when one can cling onto the tree or never climb in the first place?
Eastwood may view those on the "far right" and "far left" as moralistically shrill, as manifesting a tone level of fear and anger. Perhaps this is how the "right" and "left" overlap or come full circle in his mind. But this is a gross generalization, since the "extremes" are subjective and the political continuum fallacious.
Suppose we accept the commonly accepted paradigm of a left to right political continuum, as Eastwood offers. If we define the "left" as the group that protects the voiceless, the powerless, and the forgotten, then the natural progression would be to protect the truly voiceless ? animals and nature.
Nonhumans are excluded from our political system, without representation. They have no standing in court; yet corporations do. In fact, nonhumans are virtually omitted from the conversation in our anthropocentric and speciesist society.
A move "left" arguably means to move away from Democracy-?which is really just a rule by the elite (humans)-?to an Omniocracy (which I describe as a government of, by and for all living beings). The European Union has added nonhumans to their Constitution, as have Switzerland and Germany. New Zealand, India and Reggio Emilio, Italy have outlawed using animals in ways we normally think acceptable in the U.S. (boiling lobsters alive, keeping fish in small bowls, vivisection, etc.).
We are trailing behind other nations, but it would be difficult to sell a Constitutional amendment to our "What's the Matter With Kansas?" country at this time. It would be easier to convince certain states. You may be thinking what would stuffing a few extra words in a state Constitution really do. Well, words are a powerful tool and an important start.
Lastly, does this move to the left spit us out on right? Probably. One could argue that traditional "right" politics prompts a gap between the rich and poor, thus culminates in the rule by a few, such as corporations. To implement policies that foster the idea that nonhuman species have value "in and of themselves," a "top down" government or rule by a few (although not corporations) again seems required.
People are self-interested (as are all species) thus cannot be expected to vote against their desires. Legislators, however, are different (or should be) because they attain self-worth from helping others, being fair and inclusive, and consulting the "big picture." There will naturally be conflicts of interest between species and individuals; but government's job-in an omniocracy as in our current system-- will be to mediate and arbitrate these "disputes."
We are taught democracy is the most inclusive, just and beneficent political system in the world. It is time to re-evaluate. Successful ideas advance through three stages: first ridicule, then discussion, finally adoption. I say we begin the discussion to which Eastwood's words have provided a starting point.
The Clint Eastwood quote is posted on Oakland Mayor Jerry Brown's blog and is taken from Feb 28, 2005 issue of Time Magazine. Charlotte Laws explores this topic in greater depth on the blog.
Charlotte Laws, Ph.D. is a member of the Greater Valley Glen Council and the President of the League for Earth and Animal Protection (LEAP). Her website is http://www.CharlotteLaws.org
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
Today we wish to examine a fallacy, or error in... Read More
As the death toll in the avalanche-hit Jammu and Kashmir... Read More
Kudos goes out to the George Walker Bush's Administration and... Read More
The Iranian elections are certainly interesting indeed. The ruling party... Read More
Elliot Spitzer, recently said he wanted to drive a stake... Read More
This is the first of a series of four articles... Read More
With respect to the States' databases, you may not locate... Read More
Legislation is getting legs to further curtail your use of... Read More
When organising a country or a group of people in... Read More
There's a new Michigan state register in the works... Read More
Guides for RetailersThe regulations about marketing pearls are listed in... Read More
Introduction:Although politicians and so-called "Intelligence Experts" are the ones appearing... Read More
California Attorneys and politicians are to blame for the energy... Read More
Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one... Read More
We have known of the innate characteristic need of members... Read More
Many environmentalists are against roads through the forest because it... Read More
All countries have specific things that are abundant in the... Read More
The newest pebble reactors are easy to build and manage... Read More
I've been thinking again. I know some of my readers... Read More
Streamlining Homeland Security with a Free market flair? An idea... Read More
Many people who are expert in the issue of the... Read More
The filibuster has been a tool available to U.S. Senators... Read More
Utah introduced a bill designed to limit the use of... Read More
I propose a special Projection Device code-named: "TIPED". This system... Read More
Rational, sober, logical citizens wonder what exactly the terrorists want.... Read More
Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to Lafayette in 1823 that... Read More
Many times our government regulatory over embellish problems in the... Read More
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an... Read More
The current political efforts aimed at improving the American public... Read More
I would like to discuss a few issues we have... Read More
An irresponsible Chinese General made a very telling comment recently.... Read More
Even the most devout proponents of free marketry and hidden... Read More
In these times when states are suffering extreme downward pressure... Read More
The UAV, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle is hear to stay and... Read More
A governing.com report blast one of the major grassroots initiatives... Read More
As you can see from some of our previous articles,... Read More
Why did FDR say Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Count... Read More
Ok, here is what happened: On March 31, 2005, Pat... Read More
They do not allow the criticism of the president in... Read More
Recently a friend insisted that I read a book by... Read More
There are so many problems with our perceived perfect checks... Read More
In the last two weeks, two non-senior US officials indirectly... Read More
The United States has never done a full study on... Read More
The US Homeland Security is worried about Hydrofoil or Skimmer... Read More
Handing over power to Vladimir Putin in 1999, Boris Yeltsin... Read More
Environmentalists say GM Seeds are bad for the environment, dangerous... Read More
You have in front of you two buttons, one is... Read More
The original vulgarity was bylined: ?The Constipation of America's Mid-East... Read More
Where are all the high-speed trains we were promised? Where... Read More
Economy is called the dismal science because it pretends to... Read More
I've decided to go public with my intentions: I will... Read More
Lecture given at the Netherlands Economic Institute (NEI) on 18/4/2001Human... Read More
The blogosphere has been jumping around the story like crazy... Read More
(Note: This article was written slightly before the 2004 election;... Read More
As pictures and videos surface showing young American soldiers humiliating... Read More
Telemarketing and DO NOT CALL lists sure made headlines, but... Read More
The great leader and Senator from New York and wife... Read More
The filibuster has been a tool available to U.S. Senators... Read More
Their arrival portends rising local prices and a culture shock.... Read More
-The Protocol plan 'will remain invisible until the moment when... Read More
The FTC franchising division purports their law enforcement experience in... Read More
Is the Federal Trade Commission really stopping SPAM? Is the... Read More
The current field of political sciences is dominated by a... Read More
Conventional warfare is getting to its limits. Soon wars will... Read More
All the indicators show an improving economy and, finally, the... Read More
Year Item Price Rate of Inflation 03/80 Gasoline (per gallon)... Read More
Political |