Are we human because of unique traits and attributes not shared with either animal or machine? The definition of "human" is circular: we are human by virtue of the properties that make us human (i.e., distinct from animal and machine). It is a definition by negation: that which separates us from animal and machine is our "human-ness".
We are human because we are not animal, nor machine. But such thinking has been rendered progressively less tenable by the advent of evolutionary and neo-evolutionary theories which postulate a continuum in nature between animals and Man.
Our uniqueness is partly quantitative and partly qualitative. Many animals are capable of cognitively manipulating symbols and using tools. Few are as adept at it as we are. These are easily quantifiable differences - two of many.
Qualitative differences are a lot more difficult to substantiate. In the absence of privileged access to the animal mind, we cannot and don't know if animals feel guilt, for instance. Do animals love? Do they have a concept of sin? What about object permanence, meaning, reasoning, self-awareness, critical thinking? Individuality? Emotions? Empathy? Is artificial intelligence (AI) an oxymoron? A machine that passes the Turing Test may well be described as "human". But is it really? And if it is not - why isn't it?
Literature is full of stories of monsters - Frankenstein, the Golem - and androids or anthropoids. Their behaviour is more "humane" than the humans around them. This, perhaps, is what really sets humans apart: their behavioural unpredictability. It is yielded by the interaction between Mankind's underlying immutable genetically-determined nature - and Man's kaleidoscopically changing environments.
The Constructivists even claim that Human Nature is a mere cultural artefact. Sociobiologists, on the other hand, are determinists. They believe that human nature - being the inevitable and inexorable outcome of our bestial ancestry - cannot be the subject of moral judgment.
An improved Turing Test would look for baffling and erratic patterns of misbehaviour to identify humans. Pico della Mirandola wrote in "Oration on the Dignity of Man" that Man was born without a form and can mould and transform - actually, create - himself at will. Existence precedes essence, said the Existentialists centuries later.
The one defining human characteristic may be our awareness of our mortality. The automatically triggered, "fight or flight", battle for survival is common to all living things (and to appropriately programmed machines). Not so the catalytic effects of imminent death. These are uniquely human. The appreciation of the fleeting translates into aesthetics, the uniqueness of our ephemeral life breeds morality, and the scarcity of time gives rise to ambition and creativity.
In an infinite life, everything materializes at one time or another, so the concept of choice is spurious. The realization of our finiteness forces us to choose among alternatives. This act of selection is predicated upon the existence of "free will". Animals and machines are thought to be devoid of choice, slaves to their genetic or human programming.
Yet, all these answers to the question: "What does it mean to be human" - are lacking.
The set of attributes we designate as human is subject to profound alteration. Drugs, neuroscience, introspection, and experience all cause irreversible changes in these traits and characteristics. The accumulation of these changes can lead, in principle, to the emergence of new properties, or to the abolition of old ones.
Animals and machines are not supposed to possess free will or exercise it. What, then, about fusions of machines and humans (bionics)? At which point does a human turn into a machine? And why should we assume that free will ceases to exist at that - rather arbitrary - point?
Introspection - the ability to construct self-referential and recursive models of the world - is supposed to be a uniquely human quality. What about introspective machines? Surely, say the critics, such machines are PROGRAMMED to introspect, as opposed to humans. To qualify as introspection, it must be WILLED, they continue. Yet, if introspection is willed - WHO wills it? Self-willed introspection leads to infinite regression and formal logical paradoxes.
Moreover, the notion - if not the formal concept - of "human" rests on many hidden assumptions and conventions.
Political correctness notwithstanding - why presume that men and women (or different races) are identically human? Aristotle thought they were not. A lot separates males from females - genetically (both genotype and phenotype) and environmentally (culturally). What is common to these two sub-species that makes them both "human"?
Can we conceive of a human without body (i.e., a Platonian Form, or soul)? Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas think not. A soul has no existence separate from the body. A machine-supported energy field with mental states similar to ours today - would it be considered human? What about someone in a state of coma - is he or she (or it) fully human?
Is a new born baby human - or, at least, fully human - and, if so, in which sense? What about a future human race - whose features would be unrecognizable to us? Machine-based intelligence - would it be thought of as human? If yes, when would it be considered human?
In all these deliberations, we may be confusing "human" with "person". The former is a private case of the latter. Locke's person is a moral agent, a being responsible for its actions. It is constituted by the continuity of its mental states accessible to introspection.
Locke's is a functional definition. It readily accommodates non-human persons (machines, energy matrices) if the functional conditions are satisfied. Thus, an android which meets the prescribed requirements is more human than a brain dead person.
Descartes' objection that one cannot specify conditions of singularity and identity over time for disembodied souls is right only if we assume that such "souls" possess no energy. A bodiless intelligent energy matrix which maintains its form and identity over time is conceivable. Certain AI and genetic software programs already do it.
Strawson is Cartesian and Kantian in his definition of a "person" as a "primitive". Both the corporeal predicates and those pertaining to mental states apply equally, simultaneously, and inseparably to all the individuals of that type of entity. Human beings are one such entity. Some, like Wiggins, limit the list of possible persons to animals - but this is far from rigorously necessary and is unduly restrictive.
The truth is probably in a synthesis:
A person is any type of fundamental and irreducible entity whose typical physical individuals (i.e., members) are capable of continuously experiencing a range of states of consciousness and permanently having a list of psychological attributes.
This definition allows for non-animal persons and recognizes the personhood of a brain damaged human ("capable of experiencing"). It also incorporates Locke's view of humans as possessing an ontological status similar to "clubs" or "nations" - their personal identity consists of a variety of interconnected psychological continuities.
About The Author
Sam Vaknin is the author of Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited and After the Rain - How the West Lost the East. He is a columnist for Central Europe Review, PopMatters, and eBookWeb , a United Press International (UPI) Senior Business Correspondent, and the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open Directory Bellaonline, and Suite101 .
Until recently, he served as the Economic Advisor to the Government of Macedonia.
Visit Sam's Web site at http://samvak.tripod.com
CHRETIEN DE TROYES:Academics will freely admit that this man was... Read More
The sapphire, protector of the innocent, celestial guardian of truth,... Read More
My ancestry includes Colonel Miles (or Myles) Keough (or Keogh)... Read More
The Million dollars was my life-savings earmarked for prime the... Read More
He seems to live forever. A network television movie about... Read More
I am sick. I don't know what's wrong nor if... Read More
When building catapults, armies had to include in their ranks... Read More
Martius, the month of March, is named after him. So... Read More
First rate art is in danger of being left behind... Read More
Plato observed that the advent of an alphabet making writing... Read More
By "nobility" I refer to that class in society which... Read More
Radio was the big communicator, back when I was a... Read More
During the third week of August 2005 the Trafalgar Way... Read More
Anchor tattoos were all the rage for sailors. It was... Read More
Feng shui (say "fung shway"), often called the art of... Read More
The thunderbird has been one of the most dominant icons... Read More
They walk among us. By the mid nineties, science had... Read More
One month after being cleared of sex assault charges, Michael... Read More
GRIGORY EFIMOVICH NOVYKH (RASPUTIN):'Hail, Hail, Ras-putin'. This man's story has... Read More
The following is a general over view of African Masks.There... Read More
Success is often viewed as a magic potion. Market demand... Read More
"By necessity, by proclivity, and by delight, we all quote."... Read More
Red, perhaps the first color our eyes perceive.It is said... Read More
The FoolMy first direct experience of the fool in masking... Read More
I had lived in Vancouver very briefly as a child... Read More
This is an entry from my three volume encyclopedia.CRUSADES, CATHARS... Read More
Unlike Inuit sculpture, art prints from the Canadian Arctic are... Read More
Imagine a time when mankind was young. Migration led many... Read More
Let me first say that the rules of noble succession,... Read More
Vastu is one of the most ancient sciences of Indian... Read More
Leo Some tragic news hits you hard and makes you... Read More
In the last two centuries, new cultural discoveries have nearly... Read More
I freely confess that I have had a life-long love... Read More
It is safe to say that in ... Read More
Silver is the most common of the Precious Metals. It's... Read More
"Ron, I can't take much more of his sleazy behavior!... Read More
I had become too sick to live in America.Even with... Read More
CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS: - It seems a mystery to most academics... Read More
The mysterious and the mystical have always had the power... Read More
Martius, the month of March, is named after him. So... Read More
"By necessity, by proclivity, and by delight, we all quote."... Read More
My first kid's father named my son Marcus after legendary... Read More
Copper Keels:Nature provides varying resources in different parts of the... Read More
Leo Some tragic news hits you hard and makes you... Read More
Wearing birthstone jewelry is very popular today. Not only is... Read More
GRIGORY EFIMOVICH NOVYKH (RASPUTIN):'Hail, Hail, Ras-putin'. This man's story has... Read More
Your own shirt designed and made by you for your... Read More
Amber, the gem of a stone that's not really a... Read More
We live at an interesting time of scientific knowledge. Scientists... Read More
New Age - A Paradigm Shift to Divine Consciousness &... Read More
Doesn't it seem that today there is nothing but bleak... Read More
Feng shui (say "fung shway"), often called the art of... Read More
As far back as one can remember famous celebrities have... Read More
The sapphire, protector of the innocent, celestial guardian of truth,... Read More
No, by jewelry and the darkside, we are not referring... Read More
At the end of Part 3 in this series I... Read More
Psychic readings can be an invaluable tool for obtaining answers... Read More
"Ouvea is everything you'd expect in a South Pacific island.... Read More
Over thiry-five years ago, I picked up a book on... Read More
The Art of War is an ancient Chinese text on... Read More
Either I am one of the darkest people ever or... Read More
The export of certain Inuit sculpture from Canada to other... Read More
INSPIRATIONAL COMMENTS:"Let me issue and control a nation's money and... Read More
In 1350 AD we were still quite a few centuries... Read More
They were fierce hill tribes in what is now Scotland,... Read More
Myth One: Mexicans are lazy, good-for-nothings.I mention this one first... Read More
Humanities |