Is there any necessary connection between our actions and the happiness of others? Disregarding for a moment the murkiness of the definitions of "actions" in philosophical literature - two types of answers were hitherto provided.
Sentient Beings (referred to, in this essay, as "Humans" or "persons") seem either to limit each other - or to enhance each other's actions. Mutual limitation is, for instance, evident in game theory. It deals with decision outcomes when all the rational "players" are fully aware of both the outcomes of their actions and of what they prefer these outcomes to be. They are also fully informed about the other players: they know that they are rational, too, for instance. This, of course, is a very farfetched idealization. A state of unbounded information is nowhere and never to be found. Still, in most cases, the players settle down to one of the Nash equilibria solutions. Their actions are constrained by the existence of the others.
The "Hidden Hand" of Adam Smith (which, among other things, benignly and optimally regulates the market and the price mechanisms) - is also a "mutually limiting" model. Numerous single participants strive to maximize their (economic and financial) outcomes - and end up merely optimizing them. The reason lies in the existence of others within the "market". Again, they are constrained by other people's motivations, priorities ands, above all, actions.
All the consequentialist theories of ethics deal with mutual enhancement. This is especially true of the Utilitarian variety. Acts (whether judged individually or in conformity to a set of rules) are moral, if their outcome increases utility (also known as happiness or pleasure). They are morally obligatory if they maximize utility and no alternative course of action can do so. Other versions talk about an "increase" in utility rather than its maximization. Still, the principle is simple: for an act to be judged "moral, ethical, virtuous, or good" - it must influence others in a way which will "enhance" and increase their happiness.
The flaws in all the above answers are evident and have been explored at length in the literature. The assumptions are dubious (fully informed participants, rationality in decision making and in prioritizing the outcomes, etc.). All the answers are instrumental and quantitative: they strive to offer a moral measuring rod. An "increase" entails the measurement of two states: before and after the act. Moreover, it demands full knowledge of the world and a type of knowledge so intimate, so private - that it is not even sure that the players themselves have conscious access to it. Who goes around equipped with an exhaustive list of his priorities and another list of all the possible outcomes of all the acts that he may commit?
But there is another, basic flaw: these answers are descriptive, observational, phenomenological in the restrictive sense of these words. The motives, the drives, the urges, the whole psychological landscape behind the act are deemed irrelevant. The only thing relevant is the increase in utility/happiness. If the latter is achieved - the former might as well not have existed. A computer, which increases happiness is morally equivalent to a person who achieves a quantitatively similar effect. Even worse: two persons acting out of different motives (one malicious and one benevolent) will be judged to be morally equivalent if their acts were to increase happiness similarly.
But, in life, an increase in utility or happiness or pleasure is CONDITIONED upon, is the RESULT of the motives behind the acts that led to it. Put differently: the utility functions of two acts depend decisively on the motivation, drive, or urge behind them. The process, which leads to the act is an inseparable part of the act and of its outcomes, including the outcomes in terms of the subsequent increase in utility or happiness. We can safely distinguish the "utility contaminated" act from the "utility pure (or ideal)" act.
If a person does something which is supposed to increase the overall utility - but does so in order to increase his own utility more than the expected average utility increase - the resulting increase will be lower. The maximum utility increase is achieved overall when the actor forgoes all increase in his personal utility. It seems that there is a constant of utility increase and a conservation law pertaining to it. So that a disproportionate increase in one's personal utility translates into a decrease in the overall average utility. It is not a zero sum game because of the infiniteness of the potential increase - but the rules of distribution of the utility added after the act, seem to dictate an averaging of the increase in order to maximize the result.
The same pitfalls await these observations as did the previous ones. The players must be in the possession of full information at least regarding the motivation of the other players. "Why is he doing this?" and "why did he do what he did?" are not questions confined to the criminal courts. We all want to understand the "why's" of actions long before we engage in utilitarian calculations of increased utility. This also seems to be the source of many an emotional reaction concerning human actions. We are envious because we think that the utility increase was unevenly divided (when adjusted for efforts invested and for the prevailing cultural mores). We suspect outcomes that are "too good to be true". Actually, this very sentence proves my point: that even if something produces an increase in overall happiness it will be considered morally dubious if the motivation behind it remains unclear or seems to be irrational or culturally deviant.
Two types of information are, therefore, always needed: one (discussed above) concerns the motives of the main protagonists, the act-ors. The second type relates to the world. Full knowledge about the world is also a necessity: the causal chains (actions lead to outcomes), what increases the overall utility or happiness and for whom, etc. To assume that all the participants in an interaction possess this tremendous amount of information is an idealization (used also in modern theories of economy), should be regarded as such and not be confused with reality in which people approximate, estimate, extrapolate and evaluate based on a much more limited knowledge.
Two examples come to mind:
Aristotle described the "Great Soul". It is a virtuous agent (actor, player) that judges himself to be possessed of a great soul (in a self-referential evaluative disposition). He has the right measure of his worth and he courts the appreciation of his peers (but not of his inferiors) which he believes that he deserves by virtue of being virtuous. He has a dignity of demeanour, which is also very self-conscious. He is, in short, magnanimous (for instance, he forgives his enemies their offences). He seems to be the classical case of a happiness-increasing agent - but he is not. And the reason that he fails in qualifying as such is that his motives are suspect. Does he refrain from assaulting his enemies because of charity and generosity of spirit - or because it is likely to dent his pomposity? It is sufficient that a POSSIBLE different motive exist - to ruin the utilitarian outcome.
Adam Smith, on the other hand, adopted the spectator theory of his teacher Francis Hutcheson. The morally good is a euphemism. It is really the name provided to the pleasure, which a spectator derives from seeing a virtue in action. Smith added that the reason for this emotion is the similarity between the virtue observed in the agent and the virtue possessed by the observer. It is of a moral nature because of the object involved: the agent tries to consciously conform to standards of behaviour which will not harm the innocent, while, simultaneously benefiting himself, his family and his friends. This, in turn, will benefit society as a whole. Such a person is likely to be grateful to his benefactors and sustain the chain of virtue by reciprocating. The chain of good will, thus, endlessly multiply.
Even here, we see that the question of motive and psychology is of utmost importance. WHY is the agent doing what he is doing? Does he really conform to society's standards INTERNALLY? Is he GRATEFUL to his benefactors? Does he WISH to benefit his friends? These are all questions answerable only in the realm of the mind. Really, they are not answerable at all.
About The Author
Sam Vaknin is the author of "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited" and the editor of mental health categories in The Open Directory, Suite101, and searcheurope.com.
His web site: http://samvak.tripod.com
Frequently asked questions regarding narcissism: http://samvak.tripod.com/faq1.html
Narcissistic Personality Disorder on Suite101: http://www.suite101.com/welcome.cfm/npd
Our feelings and attitudes have a huge impact on our... Read More
How would you like to have at least an extra... Read More
It seems like I set out in this life to... Read More
Gratefulness brings a great fullness to life. The choice to... Read More
Are you tired of the same routine day after day?... Read More
We are all familiar with or have heard of the... Read More
Sure it sounds easy? "Be happy." Let's face it there... Read More
The most wasted of all days is one without laughter."... Read More
Though his racing speed is a maximum 6 feet per... Read More
I started thinking about this topic during a discussion of... Read More
You can be as happy as you want whenever you... Read More
I always marvel at the way people shine when they... Read More
What makes you happy? What are the simple pleasures that... Read More
Although many for us strive for happiness in our daily... Read More
We are in constant competitionIf we take evolution seriously, then... Read More
We can all be confident when we are sure of... Read More
Is there any necessary connection between our actions and the... Read More
Are You Chasing the Elusive Butterfly of Happiness?For many people... Read More
The quality of your life has a strong connection with... Read More
Chocolate delays reality. When I am eating chocolate, everything is... Read More
Do you want to put a smile on someone's face?... Read More
Did you know that it's up to you?It's actually your... Read More
It is now 5 years since I passed out of... Read More
Want to be happier?Edward W. Smith, motivational speaker, author and... Read More
I just read an installment from another self-improvement course that... Read More
"Reflect on your present blessings of which every man has... Read More
Witchcraft is a messy, expensive, time-consuming, and inefficient way to... Read More
"When you live the life you were meant to live,... Read More
Each moment is filled with miracles - very special treasures... Read More
According to U.S. research, you can add seven and a... Read More
What is the one thing you want more than anything... Read More
Have you ever had an experience where everything you wanted... Read More
A woman we'll call "Jane" thought she was a great... Read More
Gratefulness brings a great fullness to life. The choice to... Read More
The Law of Attraction exists in your life right now;... Read More
We all want happiness and peace of mind. In the... Read More
I like to be around positive people, people who tend... Read More
Six months ago you had trouble finding your keys and... Read More
I love this quote by Zig Ziglar, and think it's... Read More
If one thing is for certain, each of us will... Read More
If your blood is still pumping through your veins, you... Read More
Sometimes change is pleasant. A child is born. A new... Read More
Can you remember a time when you became a little... Read More
Most people look outside of themselves as the cause of... Read More
Let's just say? first thing when you popped out of... Read More
1. roll around in the grass, and don't brush the... Read More
Since the mission of this newsletter is to help you... Read More
When people are asked, "How many of you are content... Read More
Our sense of smell elicits strong emotional reactions and triggers... Read More
The quality of your life has a strong connection with... Read More
We've all had a vision or a great idea and... Read More
The most beautiful flowers, in conjunction with their design and... Read More
Imagine that the Internal Revenue Service in your country claimed... Read More
First of all, examine yourself outwardly.Look at your fingernails. Are... Read More
What is your life like today? What do you want... Read More
I have decided to declare 2004 as the YEAR OF... Read More
Are You Chasing the Elusive Butterfly of Happiness?For many people... Read More
Placing your attention, energy and focus on the negative aspects... Read More
To maintain an unchangeable sweetness of disposition, to think only... Read More
What if I told you that you have the ability... Read More
Many people live in clutter, emotionally eat themselves into overweight,... Read More
"When you live the life you were meant to live,... Read More
The world is becoming obsessed with money and all things... Read More
Many ask me this question: "Did moving to Mexico make... Read More
Yes, this is correct. Sunny Days are here to stay,... Read More
The demands of being a good person can sometimes mean... Read More
Finding Happiness |